Consider the 8×12 | Twin Cities Portrait Photography

ShareConsider the 8×12 | Twin Cities Portrait Photography

Whoo, boy.   I am so far behind with my blog posts it’s crazy! I made a list the other day and I have 3 weddings and umpteen portrait sessions to catch you up on.   But I’m trying to make sure all of my clients have their galleries up and prints in hand, so blogging what I’m up to is taking a back seat until I get through this holiday crunch.  At least that means there will be lots of pretty green things to look at this winter!

But before anyone else places their print orders this fall, I wanted demonstrate how 8×12 is often a much better print size to order than an 8×10.  Why?  Because my camera takes pictures in a 2×3 ratio.  So prints that are 4×6, 8×12, or 16×24 (or any other multiple of 2×3) require no cropping at all.  But ordering an 8×10 means that two full inches will be cropped from the photo from the long side.  Sometimes, there’s no problem with that because I’ve left a lot of negative space in the image.   But often that cropping will result in chopped off feet, a really tight frame, or other undesirable results.

Want to see what I mean? Here are two examples, recently ordered by a couple from their August wedding as 8×10s.

In this first photo, by cropping to 8×10, the entire top of the gorgeous flowered canopy is cut off (right).  But the 8×12 image (left) shows the top of the canopy and still has some breathing room.  Isn’t it nicer?

8x10Sample1

The second example isn’t quite as dramatic, but the 8×12 photo (left) shows the beautiful lit lanterns in the tent as the couple danced their first dance.  The 8×10 photo (right) is missing that added atmosphere.

8x10sample2

So what’s the downside?  Retailers are just starting to catch on that 8×12 is the new standard, so 8×12 frames can be a little tricky to find.  I checked today and Target.com has a few choices in stock. Michael’s home collection also states they have 8×12 size picture frames.   Amazon.com has several basic frames in 8×12 size as well.   Of course, you can always custom frame your prints at your local frame shop.  Or, consider ordering a fine art canvas or stand-out mount that requires no framing at all!

Have questions when ordering?  Always feel free to give me a call or send me an email.  I’m happy to send you a preview file to show you what an image will look like when cropped.

Thanks for visiting! Don't forget to leave me a comment or subscribe to my RSS feed.

November 5, 2009 - 8:22 PM

Gina - Oh my, this is a great point you address here. Thanks for posting this!

November 6, 2009 - 12:33 AM

James Bitz - I’m going to have to send some clients over this way to read this article. Very well written, and makes such a good point!

November 6, 2009 - 2:00 AM

Kelly Green - Great blog post, it clearly shows why 8 x 12 is a better choice for your clients.
I have them same problem, so I will have to think about doing a post like this in the future : )

November 6, 2009 - 9:29 AM

Joe Sanfilippo - Great post – should really help out alot people!

November 6, 2009 - 10:20 AM

Alan Hutchison - Yes this is so true, people don’t realise they may be losing a key part of the image when they order an 8 x 10.

Better still, go big – go for a 16 x 24!

November 6, 2009 - 7:24 PM

Mandi - Great post. Will have to send clients your way to check it out. Great demonstration.

November 6, 2009 - 11:49 PM

Shyann - Great post!! This really gives me something to think about!! :)

November 7, 2009 - 7:35 AM

Toni Clemens - great idea! and you explained it soo well with the examples.

November 8, 2009 - 9:15 PM

William Massey - I’m glad you’re making a point of this. The framing industry really needs to get around to making 8×12 more standard. Portrait and wedding photographers don’t really use 4×5 large format cameras anymore.

Also, excellent photos!

November 8, 2009 - 10:58 PM

Kyle - I rarely do prints so I hadn’t even thought about this issue, but you’re so right. Seeing the side by side comparison really knocks the point home!

November 9, 2009 - 1:54 PM

Kristi Wright - Like everyone else has said…great point that you’ve clearly illustrated.

November 16, 2009 - 9:05 PM

Victor Saidov - Wow! These look stunning! You did amazing job and the photos got classy feel to them! Keep up the great work!

November 19, 2009 - 3:33 PM

Lisa - Good point, nicely worded!

November 30, 2009 - 8:08 PM

Marianne Wilson - Very informative, I was actually just starting to write a similar post! :)

December 4, 2009 - 11:10 AM

shannon hayward - Great example! I did a post on this recently too! Hard to get people to understand. Good way of doing it!

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*

There was an error submitting your comment. Please try again.